THE FA CIRCUS/SUAREZ EVRA AND HYPOCITES

Well well ,what a joke,i have just read the FA comedy Suarez and Evra, here we have the FA publishing  a report deciding on what Suarez thought,reading his mind his actions in a way  that they have moved the situation into  the land of make believe,a pantomime,we have 2 men acting like children  as bad as one another.

 The FA panel seem to be acting like attention seeking children who believe they are a mixture of Sherlock Holmes,Russell Grant and Charles Perrault (author of fairy tales) .

 It seems these days that threats of violence such as punching someone is not an offence (from the FA report

1. Mr Evra then said to Mr Suarez “say it to me again, I’m going to punch
   you”.  )

 but to use the word negro is ,and in fact worth an 8 game ban,( wikipedia.org/wiki/Negro here is the word negro in wikipedia,)

 Evra should surely have  had action taking against him for the threat and in the FA report they claim (

1. Whilst Mr Evra is partly to blame for starting the
   confrontation  )

   yet Evra it seeems is inocent of anything. that i cant understand.
   
   It seems contradiction is what the FA are good at ,in the case when Evra backed by Manchester United  claimed that Chelsea ground staff had racially abused him, the FA said
   
    (We find Mr Evra’s description exaggerated… There was no good reason for Mr Evra to have run over and barged Mr Griffin as he did. It was unnecessarily and gratuitously aggressive of Mr Evra…)
   
   in the Saurez case the FA said of Evra
   
   (
   

   1. We accepted Mr Evra's account of these exchanges. The principal reasons for doing so
      were the following. First, Mr Evra was a credible witness whose evidence was not
      seriously undermined in any material respect, 

      So the casee comes down to the fact Evra was a credible witness.
      
      What i think the FA should explain as i cant remember ,what punishment did Evra get for making false claims against the Chelsea ground staff ?
      And now that they have all the evidence  in the Suarez case why is it not handed to the police for action too be taking,and why hasnt Evra reported this to the police?
      The FA have found Saurez guilty they have what they call evidence ,a crime has been committed the FA have said they have the evidence,surely it is against the law to now no make this  crime known to the police.
      The FA have said of Saurez
      
      (
      

      1. First, Mr Suarez is an international footballer of exceptional ability, playing for one of the
         best-known clubs in the world. His position carries with it a particular degree of
         responsibility. His conduct amounts to a serious breach of that responsibility

      1. The conduct
         of Mr Suarez also undermines FA-supported programmes such as the anti-racism "Kick It
         Out" campaign by suggesting to the young, naive and ignorant that racially offensive
         language and behaviour is acceptable.

         1. The use by a footballer of insulting words, which include reference to another player's
            colour, is wholly unacceptable. It is wrong in principle. It is also wrong because
            footballers, such as Mr Suarez, are looked up to and admired by a great many football
            fans, especially young fans. If professional footballers use racially insulting language on a
            football pitch, this is likely to have a corrosive effect on young football fans, some of
            whom are the professional footballers of the future. It also has a potentially damaging
            effect on the wider football community and society generally. Every professional
            footballer should be able to play competitive football in the knowledge that references to
            the colour of his skin will not be tolerated. The same goes for all levels of football )

         AND NOW FOR THEE PUNCH LINE OF THE FA CIRCUS/PANTOMIME
         
          An FA boss who sent a racist email to his friends is still working for English football's governing body.
         
         Peter Brown forwarded the offensive gag from his business account in September, just hours before Bulgarian fans hurled racist abuse at black England players.
         
         He was due to retire at the end of last month, but he is still at the Bedfordshire FA to ensure a “smooth handover” to his successor, Keith Stroud.
         
         Mr Brown, 65, had made a public apology and offered to quit during an investigation.)
         
         Well this is a disgrace,Peter Brown is helping guide his successor,i can only say who ever didnt accept his resignation should be sacked,no ifs or buts as should Peter Brown ,it is beyond belief that Peter Brown resignation wasnt accepted .

         In the FA Suarez report they claim Suarez has hurt the KICK IT OUT anti racism campaign ,that he has been a bad influence on young people , It also has a potentially damaging
         effect on the wider football community and society generally  Every professional
         footballer should be able to play competitive football in the knowledge that references to
         the colour of his skin will not be tolerated. The same goes for all levels of football .

         
         

         Well when i read all this ,look at  Peter Brown and the person who didnt accept his resignation ,perhaps Suarez has a case for discrimination,whether the discrimination is against Liverrpool or Suarez i dont know.

         I  think when a player can walk on the field and play football in the knowledge that references to skin colour  will not be tolerated is great and well done to the FA

         But also should apply to the FA themselves even more so,and a player should be able to walk the field without threats of been punched,and if they do break the rules they wont be judged by what can only in my opinion be described as hypocrites .

         For the FA to  lecture people write  that report telling everyone how they are expected to behave,to tell Suarez how bad he is how unacceptable his behaviour was how he has harmed the kick it out campaign ,while still employing Peter Brown and his boss is shocking

          Im sure the FA  must have  been  sitting there writing more reports and thinking about the John Terry case coming up and how they can preach to us all again,

         Well black or white we are all the same ,except for the FA they are red they must be sitting there with  red faces ;