desiressport: Charge Balotelli

desiressport: Charge Balotelli: Football is becoming a very strange game,all this racism debates,Suarez banned for 8 games for racist abuse ,John Terry being charged with r...

Charge Balotelli

Football is becoming a very strange game,all this racism debates,Suarez banned for 8 games for racist abuse ,John Terry being charged with racist abuse by the police  but not yet dealt with by the FA and Suarez not charged by the police,
Now we have Balotelli seen on TV stamping on Scott Parkers head ,photos of it in almost every newspaper and he is set to be banned for 4 games it seems .
A black man stamping on a white mans head ,was it racist?
When Suarez got his ban in the FA report it was said that he was a bad role model making racist comments to Evra ,gave the wrong message to young people to young players,school football etc
What message does this give out ,no one has heard what Suarez said ,it has not been heard on the TV .
Pictures of Balotelli with his foot on Parkers head have been sitting on shop shelves for everyone to see,on TV for evryone to see,what kind of role model is he?
Of all the bad tackles violent tackles the worst that can be done is to the head ,the most serious injury a person can have is to the head
He has stamped his foot into a player on the ground ,with all due to respect to racism i can see no reason why Suarez deserves twice the ban Balotelli will get,
A player can get a ban for a bad tackle ,this wasnt a tackle ,it was a stamp on a man on the ground ,the police can take John Terry and charge him ,in my opinion Balotelli has committed a far worse crime and should be charged .
It has been said that players can no longer hide behind the fact they are on a football pitch and if they break the law they will be punished well there could not be a more clear cut case than Balotelli.
The FA should have a duty to report Balotelli to the Police .he has stamped on a mans head .

desiressport: Liverpool racist issues

desiressport: Liverpool racist issues: Mirror columnist Andy Dunn claims Kenny Dalglish is blinded by loyalty to Liverpool,i dont think so,he defended his player who was being tre...

Liverpool racist issues

Mirror columnist Andy Dunn claims Kenny Dalglish is blinded by loyalty to Liverpool,i dont think so,he defended his player who was being treated like he had murdered someone.
Lets make no mistake any decent person thinks racism ,racist abuse,and any decent person thinks abuse of any kind whether it white person to white ,black to white ,white to black,black to black,is wrong and not acceptable on a football pitch or in any part of life.
And Dunn like so many people at the moment seem blinded by racism ,every other crime seems to take 2nd place to it,
Suarez and Evra both acted like school kids in the playground ,but people only see blame in Suarez ,Suareaz called Evra names and Evra threatened to punch Suarez, yet Evra has not been punished ,
To threaten another person with violence is against the law,whether on a football pitch or in the street,the FA had an inquiry into whether racist abuse took place ,but when it became clear that Evra had threatened Suarez  they took no action,in what is possibly the greater crime.
Then on Friday night we had someone in the crowd at Anfield shout racist abuse at Tom Adeyemi ,and the racism issue is back in the news ,whoever shouted the abuse should be punished
But there are men out in Afghanistan fighting for their country,risking their lives and when they have arrived back home been abused in the streets at what was supposed to be welcome home parades
So as bad as it was at Anfield i think things should be kept in context.
And another point that seems to have been missed,and where there seems to be double standards,Suarez has been found guilty by the FA and has been giving an 8 game ban ,yet Liverpool have said they will ban the fan from Anfield for life,say Liverpool play 25 home games a season and the fan is said to be aged 20 ,say we say he lives to be 80 that 60 x 25 thats a ban of 1505 games.
Now as we have heard it said by so many people that these players are role models ,the fan and Suarez have both committed the same offence it could be said Suarez has got of lightly.

desiressport: RACISM GONE MAD?

desiressport: RACISM GONE MAD?: Is the FA saying abuse is ok as long as it is not racist?a black person can threaten to punch a South American that is ok?but use the word n...

desiressport: THE FA CIRCUS/SUAREZ EVRA AND HYPOCITES

desiressport: THE FA CIRCUS/SUAREZ EVRA AND HYPOCITES: Well well ,what a joke,i have just read the FA comedy Suarez and Evra, here we have the FA publishing a report deciding on what Suarez thou...

RACISM GONE MAD?

Is the FA saying abuse is ok as long as it is not racist?a black person can threaten to punch a South American that is ok?but use the word negro andi ts an 8 game ban,

When people over react to a situation it can be racism in reverse,when  you have a campaign such  as the FA kick it out campaign it can be racial discrimination against non blacks,

Its wrong for anyone to abuse another player physically or verbally what ever their nationality or if black or white ,that is what it should be,everyone the same.

Evra is black,is he ashamed to be black?a person can only be hurt,abused  verbally if they are ashamed of their ,nationality,or being black,yet time and time again we get these cases,

I am proud of my nationality im Scottish,im white,and see black people or any nationality as no different ,to me we are all the same

On a football field another player could call me what he wanted wouldnt bother me couldnt bother me,im proud of my background ,

Racism needs to be stamped out,but all racism,racism in reverse also,when there are campaigns  for anything every one jumps on to it and can unbalance things,everyone is on the look out for racism and its getting to the stage where other things are being  missed.

In the case against Suarez it haas come out that Evra said he would punch Suarez,during the goalmouth incident Evra lifted his hands and pushed Liverpool player,all these things been missed as we go on a racist hunt ,to the extent of obsession ,

The simple fact is if you want everyone to be equal treat everyone as equal,when you have campaigns for some you discriminate against others

THE FA CIRCUS/SUAREZ EVRA AND HYPOCITES

Well well ,what a joke,i have just read the FA comedy Suarez and Evra, here we have the FA publishing  a report deciding on what Suarez thought,reading his mind his actions in a way  that they have moved the situation into  the land of make believe,a pantomime,we have 2 men acting like children  as bad as one another.

 The FA panel seem to be acting like attention seeking children who believe they are a mixture of Sherlock Holmes,Russell Grant and Charles Perrault (author of fairy tales) .

 It seems these days that threats of violence such as punching someone is not an offence (from the FA report

1. Mr Evra then said to Mr Suarez “say it to me again, I’m going to punch
   you”.  )

 but to use the word negro is ,and in fact worth an 8 game ban,( wikipedia.org/wiki/Negro here is the word negro in wikipedia,)

 Evra should surely have  had action taking against him for the threat and in the FA report they claim (

1. Whilst Mr Evra is partly to blame for starting the
   confrontation  )

   yet Evra it seeems is inocent of anything. that i cant understand.
   
   It seems contradiction is what the FA are good at ,in the case when Evra backed by Manchester United  claimed that Chelsea ground staff had racially abused him, the FA said
   
    (We find Mr Evra’s description exaggerated… There was no good reason for Mr Evra to have run over and barged Mr Griffin as he did. It was unnecessarily and gratuitously aggressive of Mr Evra…)
   
   in the Saurez case the FA said of Evra
   
   (
   

   1. We accepted Mr Evra's account of these exchanges. The principal reasons for doing so
      were the following. First, Mr Evra was a credible witness whose evidence was not
      seriously undermined in any material respect, 

      So the casee comes down to the fact Evra was a credible witness.
      
      What i think the FA should explain as i cant remember ,what punishment did Evra get for making false claims against the Chelsea ground staff ?
      And now that they have all the evidence  in the Suarez case why is it not handed to the police for action too be taking,and why hasnt Evra reported this to the police?
      The FA have found Saurez guilty they have what they call evidence ,a crime has been committed the FA have said they have the evidence,surely it is against the law to now no make this  crime known to the police.
      The FA have said of Saurez
      
      (
      

      1. First, Mr Suarez is an international footballer of exceptional ability, playing for one of the
         best-known clubs in the world. His position carries with it a particular degree of
         responsibility. His conduct amounts to a serious breach of that responsibility

      1. The conduct
         of Mr Suarez also undermines FA-supported programmes such as the anti-racism "Kick It
         Out" campaign by suggesting to the young, naive and ignorant that racially offensive
         language and behaviour is acceptable.

         1. The use by a footballer of insulting words, which include reference to another player's
            colour, is wholly unacceptable. It is wrong in principle. It is also wrong because
            footballers, such as Mr Suarez, are looked up to and admired by a great many football
            fans, especially young fans. If professional footballers use racially insulting language on a
            football pitch, this is likely to have a corrosive effect on young football fans, some of
            whom are the professional footballers of the future. It also has a potentially damaging
            effect on the wider football community and society generally. Every professional
            footballer should be able to play competitive football in the knowledge that references to
            the colour of his skin will not be tolerated. The same goes for all levels of football )

         AND NOW FOR THEE PUNCH LINE OF THE FA CIRCUS/PANTOMIME
         
          An FA boss who sent a racist email to his friends is still working for English football's governing body.
         
         Peter Brown forwarded the offensive gag from his business account in September, just hours before Bulgarian fans hurled racist abuse at black England players.
         
         He was due to retire at the end of last month, but he is still at the Bedfordshire FA to ensure a “smooth handover” to his successor, Keith Stroud.
         
         Mr Brown, 65, had made a public apology and offered to quit during an investigation.)
         
         Well this is a disgrace,Peter Brown is helping guide his successor,i can only say who ever didnt accept his resignation should be sacked,no ifs or buts as should Peter Brown ,it is beyond belief that Peter Brown resignation wasnt accepted .

         In the FA Suarez report they claim Suarez has hurt the KICK IT OUT anti racism campaign ,that he has been a bad influence on young people , It also has a potentially damaging
         effect on the wider football community and society generally  Every professional
         footballer should be able to play competitive football in the knowledge that references to
         the colour of his skin will not be tolerated. The same goes for all levels of football .

         
         

         Well when i read all this ,look at  Peter Brown and the person who didnt accept his resignation ,perhaps Suarez has a case for discrimination,whether the discrimination is against Liverrpool or Suarez i dont know.

         I  think when a player can walk on the field and play football in the knowledge that references to skin colour  will not be tolerated is great and well done to the FA

         But also should apply to the FA themselves even more so,and a player should be able to walk the field without threats of been punched,and if they do break the rules they wont be judged by what can only in my opinion be described as hypocrites .

         For the FA to  lecture people write  that report telling everyone how they are expected to behave,to tell Suarez how bad he is how unacceptable his behaviour was how he has harmed the kick it out campaign ,while still employing Peter Brown and his boss is shocking

          Im sure the FA  must have  been  sitting there writing more reports and thinking about the John Terry case coming up and how they can preach to us all again,

         Well black or white we are all the same ,except for the FA they are red they must be sitting there with  red faces ;